How important are your desires?
[Note: There's still 26 hours left if you'd like to prepay for some freelance web coding and pick up the discount. If this is for you, I'd love for you to make it.]
I’m trying to piece together a few puzzle pieces. I’m in the process of working this out, so let’s go for a wander and see where it leads us.
Piece one: A trial of fear polarity at the start of the year
I spent 30 days practicing the use of fear polarity. For quite a while I feared using this polarity since there’s a lot of baggage associated with it; it seems kind of ‘evil’. But eventually I decided that it would be useful to try as an experiment. It wasn’t going to be a permanent change, and I’d learn something in the process.
Learn I did. I essentially adopted the attitude that my desire was the #1 most important thing, and that I would conquer anything that got in my way. This had the immediate effect of clearing a layer of mental fog. Before, I would have an intention and then worry about what other people would think of it. My power would disperse before I could get started. Now, my intention was all that mattered, and any objection was an obstacle to overcome, not something that could diminish my determination. I felt like I had laser-focus on what I wanted and my intellect sprang into action in a way it hadn’t for a long time. At the same time, I felt much greater inner peace – I’d overcome a large amount of inner conflict in one fell swoop.
The surprising part was that I didn’t turn overtly evil. I still knew that harming people would make me feel bad and that it would create opposition to my intention. Therefore, it was a simply logical not to do so.
I left the trial enjoying the results of a number of great intentions, my motorbike amongst them.
Piece two: I am the only intender
After the fear polarity trial, my intensity dropped off. I still wasn’t comfortable with fear polarity long-term, but I hadn’t figured out how to use love polarity, so I sat in the middle for awhile. Then I discovered an interesting belief which filled in some gaps in the puzzle.
In Steve’s “True Nature of Reality” podcast, he describes subjective reality. Basically, it’s a model of reality centered around you, but “you” the conscious container of reality, not “you” the person. (Yes, it can be quite confusing. Check out the podcast for clarification). In this model of reality, there’s only one consciousness with intentions, and that’s yours.
That’s significant, because I’ve noticed a pattern. I observe intentions in other people that conflict with my desires, and then hold those intentions myself by thinking about them. I might think of an intention, and then think “Oh, but so-and-so will react badly if I do that” and thereby cancel my intention, even though it’s something I truly wanted.
By adopting the view that I am the only intender, I take responsibility for all of my intentions. Now, if I notice an intention that’s contrary to my desires, no matter where I perceive it to be coming from, it’s my responsibility to shift my intention back to my desire.
I tested this mindset today, and it worked. I was able to have a far more productive and enjoyable day than I would otherwise have had.
This mindset is more compatible with love polarity than the “only my desires matter” mindset of fear polarity. But it still results in giving my desires a place of high importance. And that makes me uneasy. Doesn’t that make me selfish? Isn’t selfishness morally wrong?
In which we go to the heart of the matter
The problem: this mindset works. Very well. There must be some validity to it, some deep truth behind it. But at the same time it places huge importance on my desires. Which seems selfish, and selfishness is wrong, right?
I have a bunch of thoughts on this
The first is, desire is the path to happiness. When you’re moving towards what you want, you’re happy. When everything’s going wrong and you’re moving away from what you want, you’re unhappy.
I should mention that desire, as I use it here, is distinct from impulsive craving. An easy way to distinguish between the two is to check how you would view your desire from the perspective of the future, after the thing that you desired has passed. For instance, I did a trial of polyphasic sleep several years ago. In the beginning, I anticipated it excitedly. During the trial, I enjoyed the challenge of it. Looking back on it, I look back with fondness. Completing the trial has created lasting happiness for me, and I’m glad that it was a part of my life (even if it wasn’t successful by an objective standard).
By contrast, a craving is essentially a desire with shallow, impulsive and conflicted motives. You might anticipate it and enjoy it, but afterwards you experience guilt and regret.
We can distinguish between desire and craving. Following desire leads to happiness. So why do I think I have to deny it? Because I don’t trust it. Logically, I don’t think I’ll have a desire to harm another person, but the possibility’s still there. If I allowed myself absolute freedom to pursue my desires, what would happen?
Another thought
Good deeds performed because we feel we should do them are not as beneficial as good deeds performed out of our own free will. In other words, giving our desires freedom is the only way to actually do good, because truly good acts can only arise out of our heartfelt desire to do good.
Which all leads to…
The thing that’s keeping me from following my desire: fear of my own darkness. Fear of what I will actually find if I take a deep, long look into my desires. Fear of what will happen if I unleash this potential, because it’s sitting right there.
I’m noticing that fear unravelling already. I’m becoming more convinced of the innate goodness in everyone. That maybe what we call evil comes from a source other than what I suspected.
And the theme that I’m being drawn to is to trust in my own innate goodness. To give myself permission to take a look and see what I really want. And to go after it without restraint.
This is getting interesting. Join me?





